Ideas, Legal

Why The RIAA Should Start A Business Model Instead Of Policing

Doesn't the RIAA realize how much money they're wasting on legal action instead of trying to instate a business model to help them and the artists out?

Continue Reading

Web

Follow Up: Remix Web 2.0 Style

Posted on 30 November 2008

NPR has released a very engaging series on the future of music and technology that explores a lot of the ideas that I had been considering as of late.  Live music collaboration over the web was one of the topics they recently touched on.  They describe how two artists that live on separate coasts of the United States have been able to collaborate due to new technology that has surfaced in the past couple years.  Recently an online service similar to the one that I had in mind has launched in beta but the services sound very promising.  

Dan Zaccagnino is co-founder and co-CEO of Indaba Music, an online community that allows musicians to meet and collaborate with fellow musicians. He says there are about 100,000 people who have joined the service.

Once registered, a musician can look for others to collaborate with asynchronously. For example, a bassist may upload a bass track and search for people who can fill out his rock song with guitar, drums and vocals. Those musicians can then record their own tracks for the bassist and upload them to the same recording “session.”

“It’s really supposed to be a flexible platform for people to collaborate however they want to,” Zaccagnino says.

Zaccagnino demonstrated one session started by a synthesizer player in New York. The keyboardist found a drummer online — both lived in New York, but the two had never met before — to lay down a beat. Other players then joined the session: a guitarist from the U.K. and vocalists from both sides of the Atlantic Ocean.

Now all they need to do is figure out how these artists can release their music together and reap the benefits of their collaboration.  I have taken a gander at the site myself and plan to start using it although I currently have a project going on locally, exploring all music avenues in life has been something I have been very keen on for some time.  Its very easy for one to get engaged into their current band but I think without exploring other avenues of music that do not fit the band, one can become very frustrated creatively.  Sometimes some of my ideas just don’t fit within the confines of the current group I am collaborating with.  This service will hopefully provide a way for more musicians to explore these creative avenues that otherwise fall into the abyss.  I’ll follow up with my thoughts on the service in a few weeks after I have collaborated in a couple sessions.

Comments (0)

Ideas, Web

Bringing Back the Remix, Web 2.0 Style

Posted on 25 September 2008

I can listen to music all day and have various creative thoughts but its not until I actually play myself that my ideas come together.  Tonight I picked up my guitar while feeling uninspired and 10 minutes later I had a new riff and a solid idea for a web service for musicians.

Too often musicians find themselves stuck at a point where they either don’t have time to play with other people or simply can’t find the right people to adhere to their style.  With the availability of inexpensive recording equipment for computers and the simplicity of recording programs, musicians can post a track online they recorded minutes after it’s finished being rendered into an mp3. Where as 10 years ago, 6 months after an artist went into the studio you would finally hear their tracks.  Why not create a service where people can collaborate their music in the “cloud”?

For example, I lay down a 30 second guitar riff that I enjoy but I have lost all creative energy to continue the riff that I started.  I go to this online music service, upload my riff and await for submissions of people adding on to it.  I have the ability to accept the addition, add it as a maybe, or just flat deny it.  As the first uploader, you act as the decision maker as to what you add to the original piece.  Then you leave the maybes accessible to other artists to see if they can add something to make the maybes come to fruition.  After this process goes on for a period of time, you have a full song.  Once the song is done, all of the registered users who added on to the song are credited for the piece.  Then the song is then served up for download on the site which the song writers then receive royalties from each song they participate in.

With bands like Nine Inch Nails and Radiohead releasing their material in separate tracks which allows other people to remix the tracks however they wish, this could also evolve into a remix service for established artists.  A lot of new technology has surfaced recently that allows for mixing of tracks through web interfaces which will eventually allow users to manipulate tracks solely through the web.  Although the power of software such as Pro Tools is a long way away from approaching the web,  I could see people getting highly interested in recreating others tracks simply by adjusting timing, volume, pitch, and tempo.   Once the tracks are remixed, if people enjoy the remix and download it, then the user gets a small piece of royalties and the rest will go to the artist.

In the next 10 years, it would be amazing if musicians could collaborate live over the internet but until then this would be a step in the right direction.  One of the best indie releases in the past 10 years was done through a collaboration of sending tracks back and forth online, The Postal Service.  Programmers do it, people remote in to the office everyday, why shouldn’t artists be next?  I’m surprised adobe hasn’t released an interactive feature of their software suite that allows for live collaboration.  With all of the recent online music infused start ups, I haven’t seen one that is trying to cater to tapping into all of these social networks of musicians and their friends that play music as well but live in different areas of the world.  This would be a perfect way to break out into this area.

Comments (2)

SEE MORE ARTICLES IN THE ARCHIVE